I've been studying Baptist history for over 30 years now. Until the past few years, I had never heard of a "Reformed Baptist". When I first saw the term, I genuinely thought it was a support group for ex-Baptists who for whatever reason either had a bad experience growing up Baptist, or converted to another more liberal faith group. Once I realized that the term referred to theological views, I immediately went to work to find the answer to the question, "Can Baptists be both Reformed and Baptist?" Let's take a look.
First you need to understand
that I will not be quoting Scripture in this article. This is not a
theological debate, and most of my readers will be familiar with the
theological views mentioned. What I wish to point out, is that once you
understand the Reformed positions, can a Baptist be united with it? It
is my view that he cannot.
First where does the
word "Reformed" come from? Well obviously it is a term coined during the
Protestant Reformation. The word "reform" means "make
changes in something, typically a social, political, or economic, or
religious institution or practice, in order to improve it." What we now
call the Reformers never intended to leave the Catholic Church, they
only wanted to "correct" or reform it. Once they realized this was not
possible, they declared that THEY were the continuation of the Catholic
Church, carrying with them, valid sacraments, ordinations, etc, while
recovering true doctrine. While there is much to be admired, there is
also much to question, especially if you call yourself a Baptist.
In the strictest sense, Reformed theology teaches the following.
1.
Church and State have an obligation to be joined together, imposing
punishment for those who disagree with the State Church on any point.
This was also the Catholic position. John Calvin set up a theocracy in Geneva Switzerland, where church
attendance was mandatory, but not any church would do, it had to be HIS
State Church. The gov't he set up fined, jailed or put to death any
detractors. Martin Luther did similar things in countries where the
monarch was converted to Lutheranism. To this day in Germany and the
Scandinavian countries, taxes support the church and pay the clergy.
Much of what is called "Kingdom Now" theology derives from this
doctrine.
2. The theology of the Reformed movement taught (and teaches) the following doctrines.
a. Infant Baptism (church membership begins in infancy)
b. Covenant theology (the belief that salvation runs in family lines,
that a child born to "Christian" parents is among the elect) This is
their doctrine of "predestination." This, in their view, would explain
why some countries have a lot of Christians, while others do not.
c. Replacement theology (the belief that the "church" has replaced
Israel, that Christians aren't merely "grafted in" but a new tree
altogether. This has historically been used to fuel anti-semitism.
d. Sacramental Theology (the belief that Baptism and Communion actually
confer grace, and is a means of grace in addition to the Gospel) This doctrine alone denotes a works based salvation.
e. Church Gov't should always be a hierarchy (either episcopal, with
some going as far as teaching apostolic succession, or by a synod).
Which of these views, if any, can a Baptist believe and still be
Baptist? In my view NONE. Now let's look at Baptist views of the above
Reformed positions. The numbers which follow will correspond to the
numbers above.
1. Baptists of ALL
stripes have ALWAYS held to separation of Church and State. There has
never been a nation where "Baptist" was the established religion, and
the one time it was considered, the Baptists rejected it. They knew
where it could lead, and they had no desire to forcefully impose their
doctrines on anyone. If someone was going to be saved, it would be God
that did it, not a government nor a "church". The Established Churches, both Reformed
(Protestant) and Catholic, persecuted Baptists along with all others
who tried to meet separately from the national church. This was
especially true for early Baptists in England.
2.
The theology of Baptists is not a megalith. There are Particular
Baptists and General Baptists, and each group has various sub-groups
within it. This is precisely because each church is autonomous, but the
following doctrines are held by all true Baptists.
a. Believer's Baptism. The Particular Baptists (predestinarian) and
General Baptists would totally reject infant baptism practiced by the
Reformed churches. All Baptists would agree that ONLY a person who was
capable of giving a believable profession of faith should be baptized,
and only by immersion.
b.
Covenantal Theology. The only covenant that Baptists believe in is the
one brought by the blood of Jesus Christ, that the Bride Christ chose
would be made up of individuals, and all those would make up a "nation
of priests", where each believer is responsible before God, and Christ
is our only mediator and advocate with the Father. "Clergy", while being a
word Baptists sometimes use to denote one who is ordained to preach the
Gospel, has no power over individual conscience. While there may be
times a Baptist Church would "exclude" someone for various offences, he
could never be banished from "The Baptist Church" because there's no
such thing as THE Baptist Church. There are only Baptist CHURCHES
(plural). The belief that you are elect and could reach heaven on
the coat tails of your parents would be anathema to both groups of
Baptists.
c. Grafted Theology. Baptists, while not in agreement about how God
will deal with Israel in the future, do not believe the "church" has
replaced Israel or that Israel has no future with their messiah.
Spurgeon preached on this many times.
d. Ordinances NOT Sacraments. No Baptist has ever taught that baptism
or communion is a means of grace. Only the blood of Christ saves, and
that by hearing the Gospel and believing. The ordinances have no
sacramental value, no sacrificial value, only the value of symbolizing
the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ in baptism, and the
memorial of His sacrifice for us in Communion. They are acts of
obedience, identification and remembrance.
e. Church Gov't. Baptists believe ALL churches are totally independent
and self governing. There is no higher authority than the local church,
whose head is Christ.
There ARE things we as Baptists have in common with other
groups of Christians. For example I agree with the Catholic Church that
Christ was virgin born. However just because I may have points of
agreement with the Catholic church, I am NOT Catholic! I would never
call myself a "Catholic Baptist" merely because I agree with them on
this point. You cannot be both Catholic and Baptist. Likewise, you
cannot be both Reformed and Baptist. Those who call themselves by that
name are neither Reformed nor Baptist. I believe Baptists are
neither Catholic nor Protestant, while at the same time disavowing
Landmarkism in its strictest sense. While many early Baptists came OUT
of other churches, they didn't bring the outward errors of those
churches
with them, so they cannot be rightly called a "daughter" of those
churches in the same way that the Lutherans and Presbyterians can be
called "daughters" of the Roman Church. The Reformed churches brought a
boat load of baggage over from Rome, starting with infant baptism,
sacraments, hierarchy, clerical privilege etc etc. Baptists on the other
hand threw it all out and simply constituted new testament churches
based on Scripture alone, admittedly sometimes getting things wrong. But
a New Testament Church can be constituted without ever having come from
another church.
Our existence and validity is not dependent on lineage or
successionism, although I do believe there has always been a group of
believers who held the basic ideals of the Baptists while not being
known as "baptist" in name. In fact, even in the USA as I've researched
Baptist history, I am surprised at how many original deeds of Baptist
churches begun before the Civil War, don't even have the word "baptist"
in the name. Many times the deed reads "The Church of Christ at_______"
(insert name of place). Others would read "The Baptist Church of Christ
at_______." To this day, if you drive by First Baptist in Macon Ga, the
sign out front says "First Baptist Church of Christ in Macon." Many of
these churches were founded long before the Campbellites were in
existence, starting the "Restoration Movement." The real Church of
Christ didn't need to be "restored" or "reformed". The real Church of
Christ should be RESTORING and REFORMING the hearts of people by turning
them towards Christ Jesus. Any church that fails to do this is not a
church at all, even though it may be called Baptist in name. If this
describes your church, then come out from among them! Proclaim the Good
News in Christ and join a true New Testament church or find fellow
believers and begin a new Church of Christ wherever you are, asking
other New Testament churches for help!
In closing let me quote Spurgeon when he said "We
did not commence our existence at the reformation, we
were REFORMERS before Luther or Calvin were born; we never came from the
Church
of Rome, for we were never in it, but we have an unbroken line up to the
apostles themselves. We have always existed from the very days of
Christ, and
our PRINCIPALS, sometimes veiled and forgotten, like a river which may
travel
underground for a little season, have always had honest and holy
adherents.
Persecuted alike by Romanists and Protestants of almost every sect, yet
there
has never existed a Government holding Baptist principles which
persecuted
others; nor I believe any body of Baptists ever held it to be right to
put the
consciences of others under the control of man. We have ever been ready
to
suffer, as our martyrologies will prove, but we are not ready to accept
any help
from the State, to prostitute the purity of the Bride of Christ to any
alliance
with the government, and we will never make the Church, although the
Queen, the
despot over the consciences of men". (From The New Park Street Pulpit,
Vol.VII, Page 225).
It has always been a mystery to me how "Reformed"
Baptists love to claim Spurgeon as one of their own, yet shiver at this
statement. If you know Spurgeon, then you know he is rejoicing in heaven
that he stumbled upon a small Methodist Church during a snow storm,
went inside for warmth, and ran smack into Jesus when the preacher said
"LOOK TO ME".....Baptists have never believed salvation came through a
church, nor that those in other churches are false professors. What we
have said, is that when we strive to simply follow the Scriptures, the
local church is the reason the gates of Hell have not prevailed! Kenny
Mann (see also part 2 to this article as well as "WHAT REFORMED BAPTISTS SAY ABOUT THEMSELVES")
Dear Ken:
ReplyDeleteI agree and have never liked the term "Reformed Baptists." I think some might use that term in order for others to know that they are "Calvinists" or "Predestinarians." But, the term simply has too much baggage.
Blessings,
Stephen