In reference to the word of Romans 10:17 Elder Claud Cayce
once wrote:
"The word here is the
speech of God. God speaks to the sinner who is dead in sins, and by the power
of that speech the sinner is made alive in Christ, made alive from the
dead..." (Cayce's Editorials, Volume 5, pages 123, 124)
But, Elder Cayce, if Romans chapter
ten is about “gospel time salvation” how
is the word not about…well, you know…the gospel? And doesn’t the fact that you claim the word to be the speech of God, or the direct voice
of the Son of God, prove that you’re treating Romans 10 as if it was speaking
of eternal salvation, in particular regeneration? Otherwise, why the need to give it an
anti-means interpretation?
Since the cunning debater is
no longer with us to respond, maybe some of his devoted followers will, and
tell me whether they think the elder was correct on Romans 10:17, or that he
was guilty of one of the most obvious contradictions I have ever seen.
No comments:
Post a Comment