Time Salvation is Arminianism

How does changing the scope of a “salvation” text, perceived to be accomplished by works, from eternal to temporal, relieve it of its Arminian features?

Is not any transaction accomplished by works Arminian, regardless of whether the consequence be eternal or temporal?

Is it the proposition of those who believe in this so-called salvation by works, that such is not Arminian, so long as the consequence is temporal?  But if the same scheme was of eternal consequence, now suddenly it is Arminian?!!!

If of works, then how is it of grace? (see Rom. 11:6)

If of works, then how is it not Arminian? Do tell.

Does not categorizing a text as Calvinistic or Arminian have solely to do with the actual accomplishment of the salvation, rather than the duration of its consequence?

Was not Elder David Bartley correct in 1905 when he said those who teach this heresy “seem to think that they take away the objectionable feature of Arminianism or conditional salvation, by confining it to time, and so they qualify this legal doctrine of salvation by works by inserting the word "time" between the two words, conditional salvation, and make it read, "Conditional time salvation"; that is to say, salvation in time is conditional. If so, then salvation in time is not by grace, nor of the Lord.”?

Are we supposed to think that a conditional eternal salvation would be salvation by works, but a conditional time salvation is not?

 A-R-M-I-N-I-A-N-I-S-M.