Monday, July 19, 2021

The Hardshell "Invitation"

Most nearly all PBs today receive members in regular worship services as well as in church conference. How do they receive members? Do they give an invitation for members? If so, how? What do they say when giving the "invitation"?

Now, I have been in thousands of church services of the Hardshells and I know their practice in this regard. Of course, there are always exceptions. But, I speak of what is generally or predominantly the case.

Invitation #1

(After regular services other than in conference)

"The doors of the church are open for the reception of members."

Observations:

Some only say this. Some elaborate a little. Meaning, some say, "just come forward and let us know of your desire." Or, "come let the pastor or one of the deacons know of your desire."

This is not much of an invitation. With only this, people feel more like they are "joining" a religious social club, a kind of cult "family."

Invitation #2

"If anyone would like to join the church, the opportunity is now available to you."

Observations:

This is sort of the kind of invitation I gave when a Hardshell pastor. I would invite people to "come forward" and speak if they had such a desire and the church would hear them. I was baptizing regularly. Looking back on it now, of course, I see where I was very inexperienced in how to address seekers and sinners and about how to give them scriptural invitations. 

Invitations During Preaching 

(as part of their addresses in their sermons)

"Go home to your friends and tell them what great things the Lord has done for you."

I always liked this kind of invitation that many Hardshells have given, though it alone is not sufficient. 

I am sorry to see that today, in the sermons I have heard from today's PB preachers (with exception of PBs like the Eastern Association and some others) have absolutely no invitation at the end of a discourse, and very few during the discourse. This is so sad and is one of the several causes of PB churches dying.

I have written extensively on this subject and will no doubt, the Lord willing, have much more to say on this important subject. The people to whom we preach and witness must be exhorted to do. They must be told they need to confess and must give them opportunity to do so. They must be allowed opportunity to confess Christ openly by coming forward to announce it. They must be told that if they are believers that they need to be baptized. They need to be told to repent and at the end of the service they need to give invitation to any who desire repentance to come forward for prayer and counseling. 

If I were pastoring a church today I would try to always end my sermons with questions and invitations. I would ask "if you died today, where would you go?" I would say the bible says "whosoever will may come and drink of the water of life." Will you "come and go with us?" The bible says "today is the day of salvation." Why will you delay? You have no promise of tomorrow. Don't you hear the Lord calling you?

"From Burkett & Read's History of the Kehukee Association" (here)

Giving the people an invitation to come up to be prayed for, was also blessed.

The ministers usually, at the close of preaching, would tell the congregation, that if there were any persons who felt themselves lost and condemned, under the guilt and burden of their sins, that if they would come near the stage, and kneel down, they would pray for them. Shame at first kept many back, but as the work increased, numbers, apparently under strong conviction, would come and fall down before the Lord at the feet of the ministers, and crave an interest in their prayers. Sometimes twenty or thirty at a time. And at some Union Meetings, two or three hundred would come, and try to come as near as they could. This very much engaged the ministers; and many confessed that the Lord heard the prayers of his ministers, and they had reason to hope their souls were relieved from the burden of their sins, through the blood of Christ. It had a powerful effect on the spectators to see their wives, their husbands, children, neighbors, &c., so solicitous for the salvation of their souls; and was sometimes a means of their conviction. Many ladies of quality, at times were so powerfully wrought on, as to come and kneel down in the dust in their silks to be prayed for. The act of coming to be prayed for in this manner had a good effect on the persons who came, in that they knew the eyes of the congregation were on them, and if they did fall off afterwards it would be a disgrace to them, and cause others to deride them; this, therefore, was a spur to push them forward."  (pg. 76, 77)

That is "Old Baptist" practice!

"After the removal of Elder White, the church labored under great coldness and barenness until about 1801, when the church consisted of not more than twenty members in full fellowship. About this time, Elder Burkitt on a circuit of meetings attended this place. He preached, prayed, and sung, but no good effect seemed to attend his labors. At the close of the meeting, he at last told them, “that if there was any person in the congregation who desired to go to heaven or be converted, if he would come up to the pulpit, he would pray to the Lord for him.”

"Hardshells & Gospel Invitations" (here)

Elder Leland wrote:

"So that the great query which has agitated my mind for more than thirty years, 'How is a congregation of sinners to be addressed?' at the time I am speaking of, fell with such distress upon my mind, that I could hardly contain myself. But in the midst of my difficulties, I had a meeting at a school house; in the time of service my soul got into the trade winds, and without consulting Gill, Hopkins, Fuller, or Wesley, without comparing our translation with the Septuagint, Chaldee, or the King of Spain's Bible, I addressed the scholars and young people in a way I never can without God helps me. The spirit of the Lord fell upon them. Very soon after this, five of them came forward and confessed Christ." 

Elder Leland was an Old Baptist and he often gave invitations. So too did Elder Grigg Thompson, Hardshell founding father, as we have shown in numerous postings.

Spirit Filled Praise


"O clap your hands, all ye people; 
shout unto God with the voice of triumph." 
(Psa. 47: 1)

Church worship and praise should not be dry and dull, not like a funeral service. Though there are somber moments when the saints assemble, yet there there should also be times of great rejoicing. Too many churches lack liveliness and exuberance in their worship time together. 

Believers should rejoice and be exceedingly happy when they worship and praise God in assembly with other believers. Enthusiasm etymologically means "God within." It is expressed in the words of the Psalmist who said "But thou art holy, O thou that inhabitest the praises of Israel." (Psa. 22: 3) Some translate this as "enthroned upon the praises of Israel." (NASB and others) You can be sure that when a congregation of believers is praising God that God is present. The Psalmist also said "in your presence is fullness of joy; at your right hand there are pleasures for ever more." (Psa. 16: 11) So, if God is present in a worship service, there ought to be loud praises and great joy manifested. But, some church worship and praise services are far too Stoical. Worship should manifest seriousness and soberness, yes, but it should also manifest excitement, joyfulness, exuberance, thrill, enthusiasm, etc. Praise with our mouths and lips should express what our hearts are feeling and our minds are thinking for "out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks." (Matt. 12: 34; Luke 6: 45) 

There is something wrong with an assembly of believers gathering together to praise and worship, and to hear and learn the word of God, and yet who show no deep emotion. Many of these believers can get all excited, shout and yell, when watching sports, but what about in praising God? Ought not Christians to be jubilant in praise? Do not Christians have every reason to "celebrate"? How many believers would describe their praise and worship experience in church as "celebratory"? As jubilant? The prophet Amos asked these penetrating questions.

"The lion hath roared, who will not fear? the Lord GOD hath spoken, who can but prophesy?" (Amos 3: 8)

When a lion roars, people are provoked to fear spontaneously. When God speaks to a man, the effect is to make that man speak what God has said to him, as prophets. It is the same with praise utterances. God has saved you, made you his child, promised you eternal life, so how can you keep quiet? How can you fail to be filled with the greatest joy, joy that must be expressed? 

Jubilant Celebration

"Sing to him a new song; play skillfully with jubilant shout." (Psa. 33: 3 LEB)

"Jubilant" means to "whoop" or "shout for joy." It comes from the old covenant statute concerning having a "Jubilee" every fifty years. In the year of Jubilee there was great joy as debts were cancelled, inheritance lost was restored, slaves were set free, etc. When the Jubilee was begun with the sound of the ram's horn, it instantly and spontaneously provoked great shouts of joy and praise. For Christians the year of Jubilee has come and we are living in the year of Jubilee. So, why are we not happy? Wrote Isaiah:

"And in that day shall ye say, Praise the LORD, call upon his name, declare his doings among the people, make mention that his name is exalted. Sing unto the LORD; for he hath done excellent things: this is known in all the earth. Cry out and shout, thou inhabitant of Zion: for great is the Holy One of Israel in the midst of thee." (Isa. 12: 4-6)

"Cry out and shout"! If this is not seen in a church service, then something is amiss. Is it owing to the fact that the people do not realize, in the depth of their being, that God is in their midst? Is it not because they do not fully see God's greatness? "God is greatly to be praised" (Psa. 96: 4; 145: 3; etc.) because he is great. But, the way some praise God you would think God was not so great. The Psalmist, in the verse at the top of this posting, says that believers rejoice "with joy inexpressible (unspeakable) and full of glory." But, when you go to a dry and cold worship service, you do not see this manifested. 

Another verse at the heading of this posting says "clap your hands" and "shout with a voice of triumph" and jubilation. There is nothing wrong with getting happy in worship, so long as all things are done decently and in order. Said the Psalmist: "Make a joyful noise unto the LORD, all the earth: make a loud noise, and rejoice, and sing praise." (Psa. 98: 4) A "loud noise"? Would that not take away from the solemnity and soberness of the worship? Is not quiet praise better? Quiet praise has its place, no doubt. But, it ought not to predominate or characterize the entire time believers spend together. Who can celebrate and be jubilant quietly? The bible tells us to worship, sing, and praise "with spirit" and this means with a joyous, happy, enthusiastic spirit. 

There is a popular song of years ago titled "Celebrate" and the song says "celebrate"! "Celebrate good times, come on! Let's celebrate!" The song speaks of having a worldly "party." It speaks of "enjoying life" by "eating, drinking, and being merry." But, ought not the believer have greater reason to celebrate and to rejoice and be happy? Wrote the Psalmist: "You have put gladness in my heart, more than in the time that their corn and their wine increased." (Psa. 4: 7)

When pay day comes for the worldly minded unbeliever, he begins his party time. Friday and Saturday nights are the times when the world parties for it is right after pay day and the work week, right after harvest. Unbelievers, like many believers, tremendously enjoy holidays like Christmas, and they get happy. But, why should spiritual celebration not be seen in worship services regularly?

Quenching The Spirit

"Quench not the Spirit." (I Thess. 5: 9)

We must not force the Spirit. We must not follow the flesh in Christian celebration. There are extremes on both sides on this question of jubilant praise. Some go to one extreme and have cold, dry, formal worship services with few amens, hallelujahs, and other such expressions, such as "preach it brother," "that's right," "thank you Lord"! Others, like many in Pentecostal churches and modern liberal mega churches, try to do the work of the Spirit to produce the praises. The beat of drums and the sound of the music should not be what stirs praise, but should rather be the texts of scripture and the ideas contained in them. The Psalmist said: "Praise waits for you, O God, in Zion." (Psa. 65: 1) 

God must initiate the praise. I know for my own part that I raise my hands, say amen, hallelujah, thank you Lord, etc. as I am moved by the Spirit. I am sure that many, during times of worship, feel like saying "amen" or "hallelujah" but do not do so because they think it is out of place (especially in churches where this is not common). But, this is a quenching of the Spirit I do believe. We have need of moderation in praise, not going to extremes. Just give me that old time religion!

What think ye?

Sunday, July 18, 2021

The Symbol Or The Thing Signified?

When I say "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America" do I mean I pledge allegiance to the piece of cloth, the symbol of the republic, or to what the flag signifies? Surely the latter. So, I mean "I pledge allegiance to the United States of America." In this we have an example where the symbol is put for the thing signified.

I believe the same is true with both the Lord's Supper and with water Baptism, and other things too as we will see. Both are symbolic ordinances. They signify something. 

Jesus said "except you eat my flesh and drink my blood you have no life in you." (John 6: 53) Eating the Lord's Supper is a symbol of that partaking. But, it is not the thing signified. Must you eat the Lord's Supper to be saved? Yes, but only as respects the thing signified, not as respects the symbol. Many believers have gone to heaven who in their spirits partook of the flesh and blood of Christ (in their hearts and minds by faith receiving Christ and his word) but who did not partake of the unleavened bread and wine of the visible supper. 

Saul (who became Paul the apostle) was told by Ananias to "arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord." (Acts 22: 16) Surely he did not mean that the symbol of baptism was what washed away his sins, but rather the thing which baptism signifies, which is life through the death and resurrection of Christ, and through his own death to sin and resurrection to spiritual life. 

Pledge allegiance to the flag. Eat the Lord's Supper. Be baptized. Each of these exhortations are towards the thing signified. You can pledge allegiance to the USA without pledging allegiance to the flag, though this would not be the normal. You can eat the flesh and blood of Christ without eating of the Lord's Supper. You can be dead to sin and risen with Christ without water baptism, though again it is not the norm.

Now let us observe one other example. Wrote Paul:

"Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth." (I Cor. 5: 7-8)

When Paul exhorts Christians to keep the Passover feast, does he mean the original symbolic feast of the old covenant? No. He means keep the true feast of the new covenant of which the old was a symbol. Also, I can say to believers that they must eat unleavened bread, and I could mean to do this literally, or I could mean to do so spiritually and then it would involve "unleavened bread of sincerity and truth." Many have eaten of the latter bread who have never eaten the physical substance.

What I Like About SBCer's

I like many things about Southern Baptists. In fact, I was saved through the preaching I heard from Southern Baptists. My wife was a Southern Baptist when we met and so was her family. I have many friends who are Southern Baptists. I was a member of a local SBC church for a year before going to Crossroads Baptist (non SBC).

I love the preaching of such SBC preachers as Adrian Rogers. I admire their fight with anti missionism, Campbellism, Landmarkism, Liberalism, etc. I also admire their having both Arminian leaning and Calvinist leaning members and each is willing to fellowship the other, like the old United Baptists. I tolerate listening to Southern Baptists like Rogers even though they attack some Calvinistic points I believe, because I can eat the chicken and throw away the bones. Some Calvinistic SBC preachers also attack Arminian beliefs. But, they still work together in spreading the gospel. That is pleasing to the Lord I am sure. 

We can learn from each other. We should insist on orthodoxy, but we cannot go overboard and cut off all fellowship from those we don't consider to be as orthodox as we are. I, like Bob Ross, will fellowship any who will fellowship with me. And, I will not be the one to cut off the fellowship. I will tolerate you as long as you tolerate me. What think ye?

Saturday, July 17, 2021

Leaks from Cracked Pots

"lest we let them run out as leaking vessels" 


"Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed to the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip."
(Heb. 2: 1 kjv)

I have studied this passage quite in depth as respects the latter part, the words "let them slip." In many margins of Bibles we find this note: "run out as leaking vessels." This is better. 

"Let them slip" is not the best translation in my view. It would be okay perhaps if we added "from the mind" to the words, thus giving us "lest they slip from our minds." 

Most translations however use words similar to the NKJV "lest we drift away." But, drifting away is a different concept than leaking vessels. So, which is right? Does it matter much in the end? Is not the idea the same, being a warning against going astray from the faith? Yes. But, the concept of leaking vessels I find much more fitting for the immediate context and for the general context of scripture. 

"The Greek, μη ποτε παραρρυωμεν (me pote pararhuomen), is literally, lest we should run out, namely, as leaky vessels which let the water, poured into them one way, run out many ways. The word relates to the persons, not to the things, because it contains a crime. It is our duty to retain the word which we have heard, and therefore it is not said that the water flows out, but that we, as it were, pour it out, losing that negligently which we ought to have retained." (Benson Commentary)

Adam Clarke comments: 

"Lest at any time we should leak out.” This is a metaphor taken from unstanch vessels; the staves not being close together, the fluid put into them leaks through the chinks and crevices. Superficial hearers lose the benefit of the word preached, as the unseasoned vessel does its fluid; nor can any one hear to the saving of his soul, unless he give most earnest heed, which he will not do unless he consider the dignity of the speaker, the importance of the subject, and the absolute necessity of the salvation of his soul."

Barnes wrote in his commentary:

"We should let them slip. - Margin, "Run out as leaking vessels." Tyndale renders this, "lest we be spilt." The expression here has given rise to much discussion as to its meaning; and has been very differently translated. Doddridge renders it, "lest we let them flow out of our minds." Prof. Stuart, "lest at any time we should slight them." Whitby: "that they may not entirely slip out of our memories." The word used here - παραῤῥυέω pararrueō - occurs nowhere else in the New Testament. The Septuagint translators have used the word only once. Proverbs 3:21. "Son, do not pass by (μὴ παραῤῥυῇς mē pararruēs but keep my counsel;" that is, do not pass by my advice by neglect, or suffer it to be disregarded. The word means, according to Passow, to flow by, to flow over; and then to go by, to fall, to go away. It is used to mean to flow near, to flow by - as of a river; to glide away, to escape - as from the mind, that is, to forget; and to glide along - as a thief does by stealth. See Robinson's Lexicon. The Syriac and Arabic translators have rendered it: "that we may not fall.""

Commented John Wesley:

"Lest we should let them slip — As water out of a leaky vessel. So the Greek word properly signifies."

Commented Matthew Henry:

"We shall let them slip. They will leak, and run out of our heads, lips, and lives, and we shall be great losers by our neglect."

Commented Thomas Watson:

"Be not only attentive in hearing but retentive after hearing: Heb. 2:1, “We ought to give the more earnest heed to the things we have heard, lest at any time we let them slip.” Lest we should let them run out, as water out of a sieve; if the ground doth not retain the seed sown into it, there can be no good crop. Some have memories like leaking vessels, the sermons they hear are presently gone, and then there is no good done. If meat doth not stay and concoct on the stomach, it will not nourish. Satan labours to steal the word out of our mind, Mark 4:15, “When they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown.” Our memories should be like the chest of the ark where the law was put." (Body of Divinity - here)

The reason why the leaking out occurs is because there is a crack in the vessel, the vessel being a symbol for the mind which contains thoughts and beliefs. When one loses memory it is as water leaking out of the vessel or bowl of the mind (Eccl. 12: 6 "the golden bowl" meaning the skull, head, mind, or brain). Paul said that people are saved by the gospel so long as they "keep in memory" the gospel message. (I Cor. 15: 2) There are lots of scripture that warn against "forgetting" God and his word. Forgetting and failing to keep in memory are well illustrated in leaking vessels. Another metaphor for losing the word from memory is seen in these words of the Lord from the parable of the soils, as Watson observed.

"Those by the way side are they that hear; then comes the devil, and takes away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved." (Luke 8: 12)

If the word of God is lost from memory soon after it is heard, then of what good was it? The word is removed by the working of Satan, via his devices, and this is pictured well in leaking vessels. James spoke of this under another metaphor, that of looking into a mirror.

"But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves. For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man observing his natural face in a mirror; for he observes himself, goes away, and immediately forgets what kind of man he was. But he who looks into the perfect law of liberty and continues in it, and is not a forgetful hearer but a doer of the work, this one will be blessed in what he does." (James 1: 22-25)

The idea of forgetting is entailed in all three metaphors, in the seed being removed from the heart, from water leaking from a vessel (mind), and from the image of ourselves (via mirrors) being forgotten. Leaking vessels also reminds of Jeremiah's "broken cisterns" message from the LORD.

"For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water." (Jer. 2: 13)

Let our minds and hearts be vessels or pots without cracks, without leaks, not losing contents. Our brain's memory of the things of God should not be a "cracked pot." Speaking of "cracked pots," let us speak of "sincerity." 

Sincerity

"...so that you may approve the things that are excellent, in order to be sincere and blameless until the day of Christ." (Phil. 1: 10) 

The word "sincere" here is rich in meaning. Our English word comes from the Latin "sin" meaning "without" and "ceres" meaning "wax." But, how is "sincere" related to "without wax"

In the ancient world, dishonest merchants would use wax to hide defects, such as cracks, in their pottery or statues, so that they could sell their merchandise at normal price. Honest and reputable merchants would hang a sign over their pottery saying "sine cera" (without wax). This was a way to inform customers that their merchandise was genuine, not fake or defective.

In this verse, the Greek word for "sincere" is heilikrines. Heile comes from helios (sun) and krino means tested or judged. So, the idea is "sun-tested."

The sun shining it its strength was the downfall of the shallow ground hearer who, as a plant in shallow ground is withered by the sun (symbolic of the heat of persecution). The sun shining also reveals the cracks in vessels in two ways. First, holding a vessel up to the light can reveal "hairline cracks." Second, a cracked vessel filled with wax (and painted over) will fail when the sun melts the wax and causes the liquid to "flow out" of the vessel. 

Let us be sincere, not cracked pots. Let us retain the words of the Lord in our hearts and memories.

Friday, July 16, 2021

Elevators & Stairs in Eternal City?

 



"And the one who spoke with me had a measuring rod of gold to measure the city and its gates and walls. The city lies foursquare, its length the same as its width. And he measured the city with his rod, 12,000 stadia ('furlong' kjv). Its length and width and height are equal." (Revelation 21:15-16 ESV)

Many compute this to be anywhere from 1378 to 1400 miles square. That is a huge building!

Jesus said:

"In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you." (John 14: 2)

Within New Jerusalem, the dwelling place (house) of God, the Lord's people will also each have his or her own dwelling place in it. In modern day language we would say that they each have a "unit," a "condo," an "apartment." Now, considering how large a building it is, how will one resident visit another in the complex? Will there be elevators and stairs to climb? Personally, I don't think there will be any. But, how can that be? How can I go from one end of the city or building seeing it is 140 miles away?

The answer to this question involves how we will travel in the ages to come. 

Transportation is one of the biggest problems for civilizations. How can people go from one place to another quickly? How can goods be moved around the world? Today we have ships, planes, automobiles, etc. But, will we need and have them in the ages to come?

I believe we will travel as angels do now. I believe we will be able to project or transport ourselves from one location to another at the speed of light, much like we see in Star Trek with the "transporter."

What think ye?

P.S. Another thought to chew on. What will we do as believers, at the start of the Millennium, with all the nuclear facilities? How will we remove them? Other similar things also.

Preaching Notes & Outlines

When I first began to preach (at age 16), immediately after my baptism, in the "Primitive Baptist Church," I was educated in the beliefs of the Hardshells in regard to preaching norms. I learned quickly that it was a taboo, a "no no," to preach with notes. You were expected to preach strictly extemporaneously. There was nothing wrong with having an outline as long as that outline was not written on paper. You could use an outline but only if you do it from memory. It was generally okay for a preacher to take a citation into the pulpit and to read it so long as this did not become a habit. 

During the ten years I preached with the Hardshells I don't recall ever using notes or preparing sermons. Sometimes I went to church not knowing what I would preach upon, having several different texts or subjects on my mind. I would pray the Lord to help me. Sometimes I went into the pulpit with a blank mind. It was not very enjoyable at those times. Other times I spoke freely, the subject or subjects being fresh and heavy on my mind. 

Today, however, I have a different view of the subject about preaching with notes and sermon preparation. But, even back then, as a Hardshell, I was studying the topic. I read Baptist John Broadus' "On The Preparation and Delivery of Sermons." I remember sharing some of what I was reading with Elder Newell Helms, my father in law at the time. I also studied the various kinds of preaching styles among the PBs. 

When I left the Hardshells I began using notes and outlines. This began with debating. I certainly needed my notes in those debates. I also had charts. A couple times I used a video screen with citations and texts. The few years I was with Crossroads Baptist church and their local fellowship of churches, including their seminary, I often gave both sermons (by invitation) and taught Sunday School classes. I also taught some classes in the seminary. In those instances I had notes, mostly in the latter setting. 

In these cases when I was using notes and outlines, I nevertheless tried to look as little as possible at my notes and tried to keep my eyes on the congregation, to speak from memory, or extemporaneously. In later debates I had fewer notes. 

Every preacher should be prepared to speak any time concerning the gospel and the teachings of the bible. He need not have to carry his sermon notes around with him. He will need to speak extemporaneously many times. The same is true with being called upon to pray. We pray extemporaneously. 

The example of the apostles and of Christ show extemporaneous preaching. That is not to say that they did not prepare for preaching. They were prepared to speak because the word of God was inside of their hearts and minds. Preachers must study and then study some more. The more a person knows about his subject the easier it will be to speak freely. 

Did Spurgeon preach with notes? Yes, but generally an outline. Also, he did not have to look much at his notes since it was all in his memory. The practice of making an outline imprints it upon the mind and makes it easier to follow when actually preaching or teaching. 

What about using technology, such as visual aids, video screens, etc.? Scripture can be put up on the screen, along with the outline. Is that okay? What about handing out printed sermon materials for an audience or congregation, okay or not?

Such aids can be useful, however, they should be an aid and not a crutch. The preacher who uses such too much finds that he cannot keep his eyes on the audience but must keep looking at the screen. 

What think ye?

Preparing For Great Tribulation

What am I expecting?

Due to the fact that I believe, based upon Hosea 6: 1-3, that 

1) Jesus will return around 2030, and 

2) that "the great tribulation" occurs prior that time, and

3) that the tribulation is longer than seven years,

Therefore: 

1) I am expecting the tribulation to begin any day. 

2) I am expecting to see it begin (unless I die very soon)

3) I expect to be personally involved in it (probably as a victim as other believers)

4) I expect that the present numerous ethnic wars around the world will soon proliferate

5) I expect believers to soon suffer great persecution

6) I expect supernatural phenomenon to begin occurring on a vast scale

7) I expect the rider on the red horse (racial ethnic conflicts) to be the first tribulation

8) I expect global racial wars (red horse) to instantly bring the black and pale horsemen

9) I expect to be killed under these horsemen unless providentially spared

10) If spared I expect it will be for some good reason

11) I expect the morning star to arise in my heart any day as prelude to Christ's return

12) I expect a latter day rain or outpouring upon faithful believers as in the early church

13) I expect God to give supernatural powers to believers to make war

14) I expect Satanic and demonic supernatural power to be used against believers 

15) I expect the coming of the "two witnesses" and to hear them (if alive)

16) I expect to be kept alive by the ravens (as Elijah) in coming famine, if God wills

17) I expect to be given grace to die and to suffer for his name sake

18) I expect to be given great grace to die as a martyr, rejoicing as Stephen

19) I expect that if I die in the tribulation that I will in spirit go straight to Heaven

20) I expect that in dying then I will assemble with other believers on my warhorse

21) I expect to come with Christ (Rev. 19) and have my resurrected body

What are your expecting?

Are you prepared?