Sunday, July 25, 2021

Uplifting Acapella Singing

Looking for a City (here)

Sing To Me Of Heaven (here)

Mansion Over the Hilltop (here)

When He Comes In Glory By And By (here)

Everybody Will Be Happy Over There (here)

Heaven's Jubilee (here)

No Tears In Heaven (here)

Sweet Beulah Land (here)

Salvation Has Been Brought Down (here)

A Mansion Robe and Crown (here)

When All Of God's Singers Get Home (here)

I sure have rejoiced in the Lord listening to these spiritual songs. I also love seeing the Spirit of God and the spirit of joy in the faces of these brothers and sisters of mine.

 

Bible Study Advantages Today

The Internet has its good and its bad. One of the good things is that information is now at our fingertips. When I was a young man studying the bible in the 70s and into the 80s I was forced to buy books, buy books, buy books, to get information about subjects. Not all the books I wanted to read were available to me and many I could not afford to purchase. Also, when I wanted to cite an author I had to write or type it and this took time. Now, with modern technology, I can not only read books without buying them, yea, even hard to find books, but I can with my computer copy and paste into a word processing application or word processor. So many advantages for bible study today than ever before! So, why do many believers still know so little of their bibles? Why are they not taking advantage of these things? You can listen to sermons, debates, music, etc. instantly. How much easier is research today with so much information so easily accessible and with so many aids in writing and communication? 

Further, the believer can reach the world with his computer. He can communicate instantly with believers in all parts of the world. Perhaps this is one reason why the church is losing so many members. Perhaps they prefer hearing preaching and singing on the Internet and to do their donating this way too. Perhaps many who are fed up with organized and corrupted Christian religion would rather worship God in this manner. After all, many churches now streamline their services. 

Jesus said "to whom much is given much is required." (Luke 12: 48) We have little excuse today for our failure to study God's word and many other things. Shame on us if we don't take advantage of these things.

Israel, The Exodus, & Great Tribulation

The following is part of my series proving a post great tribulation rapture and resurrection of believers. 

(See here)

Through Tribulation

"Confirming the souls of the disciples, and exhorting them to continue in the faith, and that we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God."  (Acts 14: 22)

The idea of entering the kingdom of God through tribulation is what is vividly portrayed in the Apocalypse.  It is also in keeping with the prayer of Christ.

"I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil."  (John 17: 15)

The pre-tribber believes that it is the will of the Lord to take believers "out of the world" so that they be kept from the evil of the great tribulation, but this is just exactly what Christ prayed would not be.  It is the will of the Lord that believers be present during the coming great tribulation and that they be kept amidst it.  This is seen in type in the old testament, in the judgments meted out on the land of Egypt just prior to the Exodus.  The elect of God were indeed taken out of Egypt, were delivered from the plagues of judgment, but it was not until the judgments had been sent upon the land.  If the pre-trib view were correct, we would expect that the Israelites would have been taken out of Egypt prior to the judgments being sent, but this is not what actually happened.  Further, the Lord's keeping of the Israelites from the evil of the judgments upon Egypt was not by taking them out, but by preserving them in the midst of it.

"Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man."  (Luke 21: 36)

The Greek word for "escape" is "ekpheugō" and means to escape out.  The prefix "ek" denotes "out of."  But, how can one escape "out of" the coming tribulation if one was never "in" it?  W. E. Vine says it means "to flee out of a place" (ek, "out of," and No. 1), is said of the "escape" of prisoners."  But, if a prisoner escapes from prison, does that not imply that the prisoner was first "in" prison?  Earlier we saw how the saints "come out of" the great tribulation and this verse simply says the same thing.

"Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth."  (Rev. 3: 10)

The Greek word translated "keep" (tēreō) means, according to Strong, "to attend to carefully, take care of" and "to guard," and "to keep, one in the state in which he is."  Also the Greek word for "from" in the text is from the Greek preposition "ek" which means "out of."  Thus, again, the promise is one of protection in the midst of the coming time of testing.  Did the Lord not keep the Israelites out of the Egyptian judgments?  But, how did he do this?  Is it not by guarding and protecting them while they were yet in the land where the judgments occurred? 

The idea that the rapture will take out all the godly and leave only the ungodly in the world is contrary to Scripture.  Yet, it is the constant preaching of the pre-tribbers that this is what is to take place when Christ returns in the rapture.  But, if this is so, then the harvest of the saved precedes the harvest of the unsaved, and this is contrary to the teaching of Jesus in the parable of the wheat and the tares.  Jesus said that both will be harvested "at the end of the age."  He also will say to the reaping angels "gather first the tares."  (Matt. 13: 30)  However, the pre-tribber says that the wheat will be first gathered.

The pre-trib view also says that the saints will be removed from the earth at the coming of Christ and that the wicked will be left on the earth.  But, this is contrary to the Scriptures. 

"But the wicked shall be cut off from the earth, and the transgressors shall be rooted out of it."  (Prov. 2: 22)

"But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up."  (Matt. 15: 13) 

"For the upright shall dwell in the land, and the perfect shall remain in it."  (Prov. 2: 21)

"For evildoers shall be cut off: but those that wait upon the LORD, they shall inherit the earth."  (Psa. 37: 9)

Thus, the pre-tribber has it all wrong.  The ones who are uprooted and taken away are the wicked, and the ones left are the righteous. 

What think ye? Are the exodus judgments a type of the judgments of the Apocalypse? Is Israel a type of believers in the days of the great tribulation? 

Saturday, July 24, 2021

Light Speed & Young Earth Postscript

The best explanation I see for the problem comes from the YouTube video "Origins: Distant Starlight in a Young Universe" (here) by astronomer and astrophysicist, Dr. Jason Lisle. This has been my thinking although I could not articulate it as Dr. Lisle of course.

One of his earlier videos is (here) and in it he gives several different views of Christian young earthers. 

I believe that the speed of light at creation was instant (so does Lisle). He says that scientists can measure the speed of reflected light only, and thus in one direction only, and this creates a huge problem for those who insist that the age of the cosmos being six thousand years is not consistent with the speed of light. Lisle shows how it involves itself into circular reason and will remain so till science can figure out how to measure un-reflected light, going in only one direction. Listen to the first link (his latest) where his screen shots demonstrate what he is saying.

But, let me add a few thoughts from a few pertinent passages.

"And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good." (Gen. 1 14-18)

I believe that the words "he made the stars also" include the idea that he made them for similar reasons for making the moon and sun. He certainly included them in the category of "light" like sun and moon. The moon of course only reflects light. Our sun, being a star, shines like the other stars mentioned. Both sun and stars "rule" by their light giving power, by their glory and radiation. The sun rules the day and the moon rules the night. But, over what do the stars rule? Since they are not seen during the day, it would seem that they must therefore rule the night along with the moon. 

Further, when he is said to make "the stars also" he no doubt includes the idea that the stars, like the sun and moon, will also be "for signs, and for seasons, and for day, and years." But, if those stars were not visible to Adam and Eve when created (because their light could not have reached earth instantly according to the theory), then how could they have been for signs to them? How could they use them in farm planning, for marking seasons and times, if they were not visible for the first humans? That the stars were to be used by man is also seen in these words:

"Thus saith the LORD, which gives the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divides the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name." (Jer. 31: 35)

Obviously, the light of the stars must have instantly reached earth at the time of their birth for Adam, Seth, and Enoch to see them and to give us their ancient names. 

Further, the text says that the Lord "set" in the heavens, in the firmament of outer space, the sun, moon, and stars. That is, he gave each their fixed position. The bible also tells us that the Creator gave each one his own name (Psa. 147: 4) I also fully believe that the names of the leading stars and all the Constellations and Decans were also named by him and were revealed to Adam, Seth, and Enoch and that they produced the first Zodiac (Mazzaroth- Job 38: 32), which tells the story of the gospel.

One cannot separate a star from its radiance, light emission, effulgence, or "brightness." The Son of God is the "brightness of the Father's  glory" (Heb. 1: 3). In this the Father is likened to the sun, or to a shining star, and the brilliant emanations of them are like the Son of God. Christ is deity revealed, the Word of God.

One day, when the day of judgment comes, the sun, moon, and stars will by omnipotence be made to suspend their light emitting. If God can cause light to immediately stop coming, why can he not cause it to immediately shine all the way to earth when created? 

"The earth shall quake before them; the heavens shall tremble: the sun and the moon shall be dark, and the stars shall withdraw their shining." (Joel 2: 10; and 3: 15)

"Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken." (Matt. 24: 29)

On Sunday School History

Our Hardshell brothers object to Sunday Schools because they say that they are a new thing and not authorized by the bible. The following article however shows that this is not exactly true.

The New International Encyclopedia (here -emphasis mine)

SUNDAY-SCHOOLS. An agency of the Church for giving religious instruction to learners of all ages. The method of instruction is generally interlocutory and the subject of study more particularly the Bible. In its essentials the Sunday-school or Bible-school was an important part of the early Jewish educational system. About B.C. 80-70 Simon ben Shetach established a system of religious schools in connection with synagogues in Palestine, making attendance obligatory. Historians like Edersheim and Schürer confirm the general existence of such schools then and later in the time of Christ.

Bunsen says that “the Apostolic Church made the school the connecting link between herself and the world.” Her catechetical instruction (cf. Luke i. 4; Acts xviii. 25) grew so steadily in acknowledged importance that church buildings were designed to provide special accommodations for the Bible-school. These early catechumenical schools included children and adults, who were taught individually, by the interlocutory method, subject matter beginning with the Old Testament story of creation and proceeding to practical Christian living. Gregory the Illuminator Christianized Armenia at the beginning of the fourth century by a compulsory system of Bible-schools for children in every city, while at that period similar schools were to be found in Mesopotamia, Cappadocia, Egypt, and elsewhere. In all these schools the Bible text was the main subject. In the Middle Ages the Bible-school idea was adhered to among the Waldenses, Albigenses, Lollards, Wiclifites, etc. A notable example of the Bible-school, apparently in many ways like our modern institution, were the schools of Charles Borromeo, Archbishop of Milan, in the middle of the sixteenth century. During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the direct study of the Bible gave way to the rote memorizing of set answers in catechisms not intended for such uses, and genuine Bible teaching was thus largely displaced.

It is to Robert Raikes (q.v.) that the modern revival of the Sunday-school is justly accredited, although numerous isolated Bible-schools were to be found both in England and America prior to his time and pioneer efforts were made in America independent of his example. (Consult Trumbull, Yale Lectures on the Sunday-school, Philadelphia, 1889.)


Thus, Robert Raikes did not invent the Sunday School as the Hardshells claim.

Cancel Culture

Today we are living in a cultural environment where free speech, open dialogue and debate, is being discouraged by Liberals and neo Marxists by seeking to squelch the speech of their opponents, by "canceling" what they have to say. This is not right or good. It will have its adverse consequences.

Well, have the Hardshells not tried for years to "cancel" our speech in regard to their heresies? Do the Hardshells not have a "cancel culture" in their ranks? I could give numerous examples of where they have tried to cancel others, such as through resolutions of non fellowship. Do not cults try to cancel the speech of those who are exposing them?

Friday, July 23, 2021

More Incorrect Grammar In KJV

"Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have." (Luke 24: 39 KJV)

The American standard also is as the KJV in giving "as you see me have." The correct grammar is "as you see that I have." See my posting "Incorrect Grammar in the KJV" (here) where I demonstrate this.

"as you see I have" (NIV)
"as you see that I do" (New Living)
"as you see that I have" (ESV)
"as you see I have" (NKJV)

All these are correct. Most give this because it is correct grammar and reflects the Greek grammar. See my posting above for the grammatical reasons why "me" is incorrect and why "I" is correct. If the KJV is without errors of any kind, then why this error? If the 1611 translators were inspired, how can this be? Chew on it.

Questions & Exhortations In Preaching

Can you at least use Rhetorical Questions and Exhortations during a sermon, my Hardshell brothers, if you are not going to do it at the end of a sermon? Will you challenge your hearers with them? Will you provoke them to draw conclusions in their own minds by soul penetrating questions, by a Socratic method? Will you be passionate and forceful in your exhortations and appeals? Were not Jesus, the prophets and apostles, very good at this? Why not follow their example? Not only these, but since their time, who was better at filling up his sermons with rhetorical questions and exhortations than Charles Spurgeon? 

It is said that Christ asked over three hundred questions in his discoursing, though some put the number smaller. Still it is immense. Why does Jesus and the biblical writers ask so many questions rather than just spouting answers? I have written on this before in talking about the Socratic method. This kind of teaching involves getting hearers to participate with their hearts and minds in the discourse. It forces the mind to make decisions, to draw inferences and conclusions, to do more than just listen to statements of theory and fact. Oftentimes Jesus would involve his hearers in his discourse by asking such questions as "which is greater?" Or, "what good is it?" Or, "to what can we compare this?" Etc. It was more homiletic, more casual talk, what some call "Conversational teaching and evangelism." 

Forget eloquent language and high speech. Go for common language, for the vernacular as much as possible. Speak in the language of the common man, in a way he can understand. We do not want people to believe what we say simply because they have judged us as credible to believe. Lots of cult leaders have become leaders because the people put their faith in the man rather than in what he says. 

Paul spoke of this phenomenon when he referred to those whose religious belief "stands in the wisdom of men." (I Cor. 2:5), believing a thing upon credibility alone, and upon a source that is not credible. "Consider the source" is good advice. A good speaker should say "don't believe it simply because I am saying it, but check it out for yourself." A cult leader says, "trust me, I know what I am talking about. God has given me revelation." 

Said Dr. Steven Lawson (here - emphasis mine): 

"There is a penetrating power in asking questions. Great teachers ask questions. Great preachers raise questions because questions cause people to think. Rather than giving you the answer, the raising of the question forces you to come up with the answer. Some questions are intended to gain information like, "What time did you arrive? When did you leave home?" That's to secure information. But other questions known as a rhetorical question are really a statement intended to give the answer in the form of a question."

Well, if there is so much "penetrating power in asking questions," then why are there not more of them in our preaching? Especially should our Hardshell brothers consider these questions about questions. Surely the questions we ask of our audiences, in the manner of Christ and the apostles, are not "foolish and unlearned questions." Surely they are rather "wise and learned questions." 

Lawson said:

"And this is not unusual for Paul. And I want to draw this to your attention. I, actually yesterday, as I was flying back from Los Angeles sat on the plane and started in Romans 1 and brought it forward to Romans 8. And I thought, "You know, I'm just going to add up the questions." So, in Romans 7, there are seven questions. That's a lot of questions in just one chapter in the Bible. In Romans 3, are you ready for this? There are fifteen questions that Paul asks in Romans chapter 3. And in Romans 4, there are five questions. In Romans 6, there are seven questions. Romans 7, there are five questions. And here in Romans 8, there are eight questions. So, when you add all this up, it's a total of forty-seven questions that Paul raises as he writes to the church in Rome. And they are all intended to teach doctrine, to teach theology, and also to make application to our lives."

How do we measure up to Christ and the apostles with our questions in teaching, either as a parent, soul winner, or preacher? How many questions are there addressed to the hearers and disciples in the course of your teaching? The best teachers I had in school, whether grammar, middle school, high school, or college, are they who asked questions, good questions. Those questions often remain in my head to this day, more than the lectures where only statement of facts were given.

Lawson said:

"The most boring preachers are those who preach like this: statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts, statement of facts. They're just wearing people out."

So very true. Lawson continued, saying:

"Effective teachers and preachers know statement of facts, statement of fact, then come in with a question, and cause the listener to put their pen down, look up, and process so that the wheels will turn, then go back to statement of fact, but then ask probing penetrating questions. That is very effective communication, and that is exactly what Paul is doing here."

Again, so very true. 

In another article titled "GOD'S GREAT QUESTIONS," by Doug Batchelor, we have these good observations on the subject:

"Did you know that the longest list of questions found in the Bible is made up of questions asked by God? In Job chapters 38 and 39, God poses query after query to His servant Job, who has daily begged for answers to some tough, heart-wrenching questions of his own."

Another good example, and by God himself, about how teachers should be good at asking questions, about how we should ask questions from our children, our spouses, our neighbors, our church members, etc. God often asks questions like a prosecutor (who are trained in how to ask the right questions). 

Batchelor continued, saying:

"When we humans ask a question, it's usually because we're lacking information. God, on the other hand, knows everything. He's omniscient; nothing is a mystery for Him. So I started wondering, Why are there so many Scriptures in which God asks a question? As I began looking through my Bible, I found hundreds of them! What I've discovered is that God does not ask questions because He doesn't know the answers. He asks us deep, penetrating questions because He wants us to think."

Think of the many questions the Lord asked of Adam and Eve after they had sinned. When the Lord asked Adam "what have you done?" and "have you eaten of the forbidden tree?" he was not seeking information for he already knew the answers, but asked them so that Adam would have opportunity to admit the crime. Prosecutors often ask questions that they already know the answers, but they ask them in order to get the answers on record, maybe an admission of guilt, or a perjury.   

Sometimes the questions that are asked by effective teachers and speakers are uncomfortable, even irritating to some audiences. They can be provocative. Care should be used in the kind and manner of questions that we ask. A good debater will know the best questions to ask of his opponents. 

So much of the social, religious, and political debate today is nothing but strife and wrangling. Rule by the people, or the majority, or democracy, requires public debate. That is our history. Let both sides of an issue debate who has the better policy, the better laws and values, etc. But, it can only work and succeed where democracies have citizens who are educated enough to vote on issues without being swayed by smooth talkers, and who can choose the best qualified, morally and intellectually, to represent them and to rule over them. Honest debate, a sincere desire for truth and fact, is the foundation of our democracy. All tyrants and authoritarian dictators do not want debate and free speech.